This listing includes AI condition scoring, neighbourhood intelligence, and market valuation data — giving you a complete picture before you visit. Compare rental yield, price per square metre, and location strength against the broader Portuguese market to assess whether this property fits your investment strategy.
1-bedroom, 1-bathroom apartment of 73 m², built in 2000, energy rating D. Located on rua Francisco Ferrer, 48, Almada, Cova da Piedade, Pragal e Cacilhas parish, Almada municipality, Setúbal district. Noteworthy Features: This apartment includes a spacious 72 m² terrace ideal for outdoor gatherings and relaxation, alongside a cozy sunroom with access from the bedroom for added comfort.
The valuation. The asking price of €270,000 positions the property €48,628 (18.0%) above its fair value of €221,372, indicating it is overpriced. This discrepancy suggests caution for potential investors considering the purchase.
Fair value modelled at €221,372 from the area baseline, adjusted for condition and location. Asking €270,000 sits €48,628 (18.0%) above — overpriced versus fair value.
Asking €270,000 versus the rua Francisco Ferrer, 48 area baseline of €210,824 (€2,888/m²) for a median-condition unit of this size — the gap before quality adjustments.
AI Condition Index 70/100 (Condition 68 · Materials 76 · Room dimensions 70). Below-median condition lowers fair value versus a renovated baseline unit.
Neighbourhood score 69/100 (Housing Market 80 · Amenities 70 · Economic 85 · Tenant Quality 60). Strong amenities and housing-market momentum support a premium to baseline.
rua Francisco Ferrer, 48
Area baseline €210,824 + condition -€5,475 + location +€16,023 = modelled fair value of €221,372 (€3,032/m²), a €48,628 (18.0%) gap versus the €270,000 asking price.
| Reference | Status | Price | €/m² | vs subject | Condition | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rua Francisco Ferrer, 48 | Subject | €270,000 | €3,699 | — | 68 | 69 |
| Almada, Cova da Piedade, Pragal e Cacilhas · 38acda | Active | €245,000 | €2,988 | 19.2% | 70 | 80 |
| rua Eduardo Viana, 2 | Active | €500,000 | €4,167 | 12.7% | 75 | 74 |
| praceta José Correia da Serra | Active | €260,000 | €3,562 | 3.7% | 75 | 77 |
| rua Ary dos Santos | Active | €235,000 | €3,983 | 7.7% | 70 | 75 |
| Median comp | €252,500 | €3,773 | 2.0% | 73 | 76 |
Long-term rental This property is overpriced by 18.0%, with a fair value of €221,372 compared to the listing price of €270,000, which diminishes its attractiveness for long-term rental investments. The gross yield of 3.1% suggests that potential rental income would not be sufficient to offset the initial purchase cost in this overvalued market. Buy-and-hold Given that this one-bedroom apartment is priced significantly above its fair value, the potential for capital appreciation is limited, and long-term growth prospects appear bleak. The 70/100 condition rating may not justify the current market price, making it a less compelling buy-and-hold candidate. Family rental While the suburban location near Lisbon may appeal to families, the property’s 3.1% yield and overpriced status could deter family rental prospects. High demand for family-friendly housing in commuter areas does not compensate for the disadvantage of acquiring an overpriced asset. Not ideal for short-term vacation rental Because of its overpriced nature, this property lacks the financial metrics to support a profitable short-term vacation rental strategy. Additionally, the surrounding suburban context may not attract the same tourist interest as more centrally located accommodations. Not ideal for student housing The apartment's inflated listing price over its fair value makes it unfit for student housing, where profit margins are typically tighter. Moreover, the area’s amenities and tenant quality ratings suggest limited appeal to the student demographic, compounding its unsuitability for this rental strategy.
Tenant turnover risk The tenant stability score of 60/100 indicates a higher likelihood of tenant turnover, which could lead to periods of vacancy and decreased rental income.
