This listing includes AI condition scoring, neighbourhood intelligence, and market valuation data — giving you a complete picture before you visit. Compare rental yield, price per square metre, and location strength against the broader Portuguese market to assess whether this property fits your investment strategy.
1-bedroom, 1-bathroom apartment of 53 m², built in 1982, energy rating C. Located on rua Cidade de Bruxelas, Agualva e Mira-Sintra parish, Sintra municipality, Lisbon district. Noteworthy Features: This apartment includes high-quality soundproof windows that enhance privacy and tranquility, and it benefits from a dedicated storage area next to the unit for added convenience.
The valuation. The asking price of €229,000 is significantly above fair value, which is estimated at €123,624, resulting in an overvaluation of €105,376 or 46.0%. This suggests a lack of investment opportunity based on current market conditions.
Fair value modelled at €123,624 from the area baseline, adjusted for condition and location. Asking €229,000 sits €105,376 (46.0%) above — overpriced versus fair value.
Asking €229,000 versus the rua Cidade de Bruxelas area baseline of €113,738 (€2,146/m²) for a median-condition unit of this size — the gap before quality adjustments.
AI Condition Index 77/100 (Condition 75 · Materials 80 · Room dimensions 74). Above-median finish quality lifts fair value versus a baseline unit needing CapEx.
Neighbourhood score 69/100 (Housing Market 70 · Amenities 65 · Economic 70 · Tenant Quality 67). Strong amenities and housing-market momentum support a premium to baseline.
rua Cidade de Bruxelas
Area baseline €113,738 + condition +€1,242 + location +€8,644 = modelled fair value of €123,624 (€2,333/m²), a €105,376 (46.0%) gap versus the €229,000 asking price.
| Reference | Status | Price | €/m² | vs subject | Condition | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rua Cidade de Bruxelas | Subject | €229,000 | €4,321 | — | 75 | 69 |
| alameda de São Marcos | Active | €230,000 | €5,227 | 21.0% | 75 | 73 |
| rua Sacadura Cabral, 3 | Active | €225,000 | €4,688 | 8.5% | 72 | 71 |
| rua Madressilvas | Active | €230,000 | €4,182 | 3.2% | 73 | 73 |
| rua de Itália, 6 | Active | €280,000 | €3,889 | 10.0% | 75 | 75 |
| Median comp | €230,000 | €4,435 | 2.6% | 74 | 73 |
Long-term rental The property is overpriced at €229,000 compared to the fair value of €123,624, indicating a significant gap of 46.0%. With a gross yield of 4.2%, potential rental income does not justify the high entry price. Buy-and-hold Investing in this property as a buy-and-hold strategy is challenging due to its overpriced nature, with a fair value far below the listing price. The moderate condition score of 77/100 may not enhance the long-term appreciation enough to warrant the current cost. Family rental While targeting family rentals may seem appealing in a suburban area with access to Lisbon, the property is overpriced at €229,000 relative to the fair value. This substantial valuation gap could deter families looking for affordable, quality housing in the neighborhood. Short-term vacation rental Given its overpriced status, this property is not ideal for short-term vacation rental strategies. The current valuation does not align with the expected returns from the short-term rental market. Luxury market The property is far from appropriate for the luxury market, especially given its overpriced nature and significant gap from fair value. Luxury buyers typically seek properties that justify their premium pricing, which this apartment does not. Student housing This property, priced significantly above its fair value, is not suitable for a student housing investment. The high acquisition cost could limit accessibility for students seeking affordable accommodation.
Economic Vulnerability The property may face financial challenges due to an economic stability score of 70, indicating a moderate risk of economic downturns adversely affecting tenant retention and rental income stability. Tenant Turnover Risk With a tenant stability score of 67, there is a heightened risk of turnover, which could lead to increased vacancy rates and associated costs.
