This listing includes AI condition scoring, neighbourhood intelligence, and market valuation data — giving you a complete picture before you visit. Compare rental yield, price per square metre, and location strength against the broader Portuguese market to assess whether this property fits your investment strategy.
2-bedroom, 1-bathroom apartment of 71 m², built in 1985, energy rating D. Located Cascais e Estoril parish, Cascais municipality, Lisbon district. Noteworthy Features: The apartment includes a private parking space and is located just 15 minutes from Cascais Center, enhancing its investment appeal in a vibrant neighborhood.
The valuation. The asking price of €380,000 is above its fair value of €365,030 by €14,970 (3.9%). This indicates that the property is overpriced compared to market standards.
Fair value modelled at €365,030 from the area baseline, adjusted for condition and location. Asking €380,000 sits €14,970 (3.9%) above — overpriced versus fair value.
Asking €380,000 versus the Cascais e Estoril, Cascais, Lisbon area baseline of €351,379 (€4,949/m²) for a median-condition unit of this size — the gap before quality adjustments.
AI Condition Index 65/100 (Condition 65 · Materials 62 · Room dimensions 68). Below-median condition lowers fair value versus a renovated baseline unit.
Neighbourhood score 68/100 (Housing Market 72 · Amenities 60 · Economic 75 · Tenant Quality 65). Strong amenities and housing-market momentum support a premium to baseline.
Cascais e Estoril, Cascais, Lisbon
Area baseline €351,379 + condition -€11,648 + location +€25,299 = modelled fair value of €365,030 (€5,141/m²), a €14,970 (3.9%) gap versus the €380,000 asking price.
| Reference | Status | Price | €/m² | vs subject | Condition | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cascais e Estoril · b45329 | Subject | €380,000 | €5,352 | — | 65 | 68 |
| Cascais e Estoril · 65a63d | Active | €615,000 | €7,500 | 40.1% | — | 71 |
| travessa do Maçarico, 19 | Active | €536,000 | €5,414 | 1.2% | 68 | 73 |
| travessa do Maçarico, 19 | Active | €536,000 | €5,414 | 1.2% | 70 | 68 |
| avenida Lago S / N | Active | €445,000 | €5,933 | 10.9% | 66 | 67 |
| Median comp | €536,000 | €5,674 | 6.0% | 68 | 70 |
Long-term rental The 2-bed apartment in Cascais e Estoril presents an annual yield of 4.3%, which is decent but reflects the property's overpriced status. Given the 3.9% gap from its fair value, potential long-term rental returns are limited due to the elevated entry price. Family rental This apartment offers a considerable space for family living; however, the property's condition rating of 65/100 suggests it requires improvements to attract family tenants effectively. The current listing price indicates it is overpriced, which may hinder rental demand from families seeking value. Buy-and-hold Although Cascais e Estoril is part of the desirable Greater Lisbon metropolitan area, the current asking price of €380,000 positions the property as overpriced against its fair value. As a buy-and-hold investment, the limited upside potential due to its 3.9% gap from fair value may not justify the long-term commitment. Not ideal for luxury market Given its condition and neighborhood ratings, this apartment does not align with luxury market expectations, making it less appealing to high-end buyers. Its overpriced status further limits its viability in the upscale segment. Not ideal for short-term rental The 4.3% gross yield suggests that the property may not generate sufficient returns for short-term rental activities. Additionally, its overpriced nature may deter seasonal tenants seeking more competitive options. Not ideal for student housing The property’s location in Cascais e Estoril, while part of the Greater Lisbon area, does not cater to a significant student demographic. Coupled with its overpriced listing, it makes it an unsuitable choice for student rental markets.
Economic Vulnerability With an Economic Stability score of 75/100, there is a moderate risk that economic downturns could impact rental income, while the Tenant Stability score of 65/100 suggests potential tenant turnover may further exacerbate this risk.
