This listing includes AI condition scoring, neighbourhood intelligence, and market valuation data — giving you a complete picture before you visit. Compare rental yield, price per square metre, and location strength against the broader Portuguese market to assess whether this property fits your investment strategy.
3-bedroom, 3-bathroom apartment of 74 m², energy rating C. Located Benfica parish, Lisbon municipality, Lisbon district. This property boasts a unique feature of having three façades, maximizing natural light and providing panoramic views from the sixth floor balcony.
The valuation. The asking price of €599,900 sits at 45.6% above the fair value of €326,334. Consequently, this property is overpriced, limiting its appeal to discerning investors.
Fair value modelled at €326,334 from the area baseline, adjusted for condition and location. Asking €599,900 sits €273,566 (45.6%) above — overpriced versus fair value.
Asking €599,900 versus the Benfica, Lisbon, Lisbon area baseline of €291,412 (€3,938/m²) for a median-condition unit of this size — the gap before quality adjustments.
AI Condition Index 80/100 (Condition 77 · Materials 85 · Room dimensions 78). Above-median finish quality lifts fair value versus a baseline unit needing CapEx.
Neighbourhood score 75/100 (Housing Market 80 · Amenities 80 · Economic 85 · Tenant Quality 65). Strong amenities and housing-market momentum support a premium to baseline.
Benfica, Lisbon, Lisbon
Area baseline €291,412 + condition +€5,781 + location +€29,141 = modelled fair value of €326,334 (€4,410/m²), a €273,566 (45.6%) gap versus the €599,900 asking price.
| Reference | Status | Price | €/m² | vs subject | Condition | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benfica · 49b8d8 | Subject | €599,900 | €8,107 | — | 77 | 75 |
| Benfica · ba578f | Active | €599,900 | €6,976 | 14.0% | 80 | 76 |
| Benfica · 49b85d | Active | €599,900 | €6,976 | 14.0% | 82 | 76 |
| rua Aristides de Sousa Mendes | Active | €700,000 | €5,385 | 33.6% | 74 | 79 |
| rua José da Purificação Chaves, 10 | Active | €565,000 | €5,539 | 31.7% | 75 | 82 |
| Median comp | €599,900 | €6,258 | 22.8% | 78 | 78 |
Buy-and-hold The property at €599,900 is significantly overpriced, with a fair value of only €326,334 representing a 45.6% gap. This gap diminishes the property’s potential returns, making it a less attractive buy-and-hold investment in an area characterized by standard urban residential features. Long-term rental With a gross yield of only 2.4%, the apartment's pricing does not justify its long-term rental potential, further compounded by its overpriced listing. Investors may find that the neighborhood's quality does not support the elevated asking price, limiting rental demand and return on investment. Family rental The high asking price of €599,900 does not align with the fair value assessment, suggesting this property is overpriced for family rental purposes. Although the condition and neighborhood rating are decent, the steep price may deter families seeking affordable housing options. Not ideal for short-term vacation rental Given its current pricing, the apartment is not suitable for short-term vacation rentals, as it lacks the value proposition to compete effectively in that market. This is further supported by the general residential nature of the Lisbon suburb, which does not cater well to vacationers. Not ideal for luxury market The property does not meet the criteria for luxury market investments, primarily due to its excessive asking price that overshadows its average condition and neighborhood rating. A serious investment in the luxury sector demands a lower price-to-value ratio, which this apartment fails to provide. Not ideal for student housing The overpriced nature of this apartment makes it an unsuitable candidate for student housing, as students typically seek more affordable accommodations. With fair market value far below the listing price, it is unlikely to attract a steady stream of tenants in this demographic.
Tenant turnover risk The tenant stability score of 65/100 may indicate a higher likelihood of tenant turnover, potentially leading to increased vacancy periods and associated costs.
