This listing includes AI condition scoring, neighbourhood intelligence, and market valuation data — giving you a complete picture before you visit. Compare rental yield, price per square metre, and location strength against the broader Portuguese market to assess whether this property fits your investment strategy.
4-bedroom, 3-bathroom villa of 232 m², energy rating C. Located on rua Campo Lg., 2, Santo Quintino parish, Sobral de Monte Agraço municipality, Lisbon district. Noteworthy Features: The villa includes an automated home system for enhanced convenience, and the outdoor spaces are designed for family gatherings, featuring multiple exits to leisure areas. Location: Located in a tranquil residential area, ideal for families seeking quality of life while remaining close to local amenities and road access.
The valuation. The asking price of €520,000 sits above the fair value of €490,301, indicating the property is overpriced by €29,699 (5.7%). This suggests potential buyers may want to negotiate aggressively. Buy-to-flip angle. A buy-to-flip strategy could involve investing in cosmetic upgrades to enhance appeal, with the goal of quickly reselling at a profit. However, market conditions may limit significant short-term gains due to its overpriced status. Buy-to-let angle. The estimated rental income for this villa is around €2,167 per month, providing a gross yield of 5%. This yield indicates a decent return for long-term rental investors despite the property's current asking price.
Fair value modelled at €490,301 from the area baseline, adjusted for condition and location. Asking €520,000 sits €29,699 (5.7%) above — overpriced versus fair value.
Asking €520,000 versus the rua Campo Lg., 2 area baseline of €459,592 (€1,981/m²) for a median-condition unit of this size — the gap before quality adjustments.
AI Condition Index 78/100 (Condition 80 · Materials 79 · Room dimensions 76). Above-median finish quality lifts fair value versus a baseline unit needing CapEx.
Neighbourhood score 60/100 (Housing Market 65 · Amenities 55 · Economic 55 · Tenant Quality 65). Strong amenities and housing-market momentum support a premium to baseline.
rua Campo Lg., 2
Area baseline €459,592 + condition +€12,325 + location +€18,384 = modelled fair value of €490,301 (€2,113/m²), a €29,699 (5.7%) gap versus the €520,000 asking price.
| Reference | Status | Price | €/m² | vs subject | Condition | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rua Campo Lg., 2 | Subject | €520,000 | €2,241 | — | 80 | 60 |
| rua Fonte da Lage, 4 | Active | €245,000 | €2,988 | 33.3% | 64 | 62 |
| Sobral de Monte Agraço · ac9816 | Active | €765,000 | €3,036 | 35.4% | 85 | 58 |
| Sobral de Monte Agraço · 9371c2 | Active | €750,000 | €5,769 | 157.4% | 72 | 56 |
| rua Principal | Active | €347,000 | €2,103 | 6.2% | 68 | 64 |
| Median comp | €548,500 | €3,012 | 34.4% | 70 | 60 |
Long-term rental The property is priced at €520,000, which is 5.7% above its fair value of €490,301, indicating it is overpriced for long-term rental purposes. With a gross yield of 5%, this investment does not meet the expected return thresholds typically sought by long-term rental investors. Buy-and-hold At €520,000, the villa is overpriced compared to its fair valuation of €490,301, resulting in a potential 5.7% discrepancy. This gap detracts from the appeal of a buy-and-hold strategy, as long-term appreciation may not sufficiently offset the higher acquisition cost. Family rental The listing price of €520,000 exceeds the fair market value of €490,301, meaning it is overpriced for a family rental investment. In a neighbourhood rated 60/100, the premium on this property could limit its attractiveness to potential family tenants, especially when considering total housing costs. Not ideal for The villa is not suitable for short-term vacation rental, luxury market positioning, or student housing. Given its current pricing and condition score of 78/100, alternative strategies would yield better results than pursuing these sectors.
Tenant turnover risk Given the tenant stability score of 65/100, there may be a higher likelihood of tenant turnover, which could lead to increased vacancy rates and associated costs.
